“I think America needs an honest discourse with itself; this is the greatest country in the world, by default. But we could actually be the greatest country that ever existed, if we were just honest about who we are and what we are and where we want to go…”
– Dave Chappelle, comedian
I’m not the first to propose new designs for the American Dollar. Redesigning the USD notes is a popular concept amongst currency enthusiasts. I’m guessing it’s because the notes are – for a country of the ‘developed world’ – stubbornly conservative. The $1 bill’s design is iconic, not only because it is longstanding, but because it refuses to change in spite of all the technological and societal advancements of the last 80 years. The $1 bill is one of the few circulating touchstones to an era that is so distant, to the point of being mythological. Altering the $1 bill design would be an admission that the world will never return to austere, good old days; where men were men and woman were women, everyone had a charismatic glint in their eyes as they gazed upon the camera lens; merry policemen at the milkshake bar; dollar hamburgers; Marilyn Monroe; Norman Rockwell…etc. etc.
Yes… the change of design to the $1 bill would signify an undeniable moment of maturity in America’s self-awareness. And given that the $1 bill’s iconography is global in its reach, a change to the $1 bill’s design may also signify a shift in humanity’s self-awareness.
These fictional designs are from the year 2028. In that future, America has experienced the final revolution of its lifecycle. After the American Civil War 2.0, the country is renamed the Union of American Republics, and is made up of 5 main administrative regions. The money is issued by the treasury, which has moved to the building of the Joslyn Museum in Omaha, Nebraska. The Joslyn building was chosen as an appropriate location for the UAR Treasury for Omaha’s relative safety from environmental impacts. The museum makes a suitable setting, with its imposing Art Deco structure combined with Native American styling.
There was a fundamental divide in the American psyche that was bound for conflict. This was not a divide between Republican and Democrat, per se, (although it is commonly agreed by historians that the trigger for the conflict was the failed elections of 2016)… Nor is it encapsulated by many of the other divisions in American society – racial divides, divisions in age or gender etc. In fact, the irreconcilable divide in the American psyche was between Liberal Internationalist Ideology, on the one hand, and Libertarianism, Individualism, and Preservation, on the other. These two irreconcilable mindsets were instilled in America’s inception; these two mindsets have both contributed equally to America’s function in the world, yet they represent two contradictory ideologies that are too far from each other to co-exist: all things come to a head. All movements and trends reach their extreme before quickly reversing. It was inevitable that the American psyche would be resolved, at some point, by the final American Civil War.
The Internationalist, Statist and Liberal worldview sees government as the protector; the top of the pyramid. And as such, the top-down everyday application of liberal government – Political Correctness – is irreproachable, and is applied without exception, in the pursuit of equality and social justice – the original ideals of Liberalism. Internationalism grew out of America’s beginnings, from the first pioneers to arrive to a new continent; America’s self-perception was implicated in a global worldview.
By contrast, American Libertarianism is borne of conflict with government, and the subsequent need for ‘checks and balances’. The ever-present threat of government instills negative obligations in the American Constitution and other founding documents – what government canNOT do – and encourages the preservation of liberties and obligations in the people.
After sporadic armed conflicts, injustice and violent debate, the ‘civil war’ is resolved when both sides understand they share a ‘common enemy’. At that moment, ideologies are dissolved by an all-encompassing desire for self-development and self-actualization. American society becomes invigorated by a new sincerity.
The USA split into various regions, and was re-named The Union of North American Republics, or the UAR for short (although the currency retained its name of the ‘US Dollar’). The Constitution was re-installed, and the presidency became a consortium of 10 elected candidates.
new US Dollar features Salish and Native American eagle designs, and
the US flag, subtly in the background. The font is without gender, yet
bold. The designs reflect ‘the revival’ – the revival of tradition,
ritual, what is essential; spirituality, nature, and
<p style=”text-align: justify;”>The design reflects a society that, through conflict, has found re-birth through Return – what Terrance McKenna called ‘The Archaic Revival’. There is no more ‘cult of personality’ – in a single US president, past or future. There is no more reliance on government – the only rule is self-responsibility. The tables turn – the Far East is the new embodiment of mercantilism and materialism as the old United States once was; The Union of North American Republics is the new world’s spiritual axis; a land of clean energy, alternative medicine, personal spirituality, healing, introspection and sincerity.
Due to societal and geological changes, the Salish and Native American cultures emerged as locus points for America’s new identity. Thus, they are honoured in these designs.
The notes feature text in 3-color intaglio, with the Union Treasury logo in green. The notes are all printed in 5 offset plates. The $100 features silk-screened magnetic ink. Other features pictured here include micro-texts, anti-scan patterns, numbering, thread and watermark.
Of course, in a real currency project there would be many more features; the emphasis here is on the initial concept.